Competition Law in Turkey


Legal Framework and Enforcement

1. Introduction

Competition law in Turkey aims to protect effective competition in markets, prevent anti-competitive practices, and ensure consumer welfare. The Turkish competition law regime is largely aligned with European Union competition law and is enforced by an independent administrative authority. Over the years, Turkey has developed a robust and increasingly sophisticated competition law system.


2. Legal Basis of Competition Law in Turkey

2.1. Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition

The cornerstone of Turkish competition law is the Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition, which entered into force in 1994.

The primary objectives of the law are:

  • Preventing agreements, decisions, and practices that restrict competition
  • Prohibiting the abuse of dominant position
  • Controlling mergers and acquisitions that may significantly impede effective competition

The structure and substantive rules of Law No. 4054 closely resemble Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).


2.2. Turkish Competition Authority

The Turkish Competition Authority (TCA) (Rekabet Kurumu) is the independent administrative body responsible for enforcing competition law in Turkey.

Its main functions include:

  • Conducting investigations
  • Granting exemptions and negative clearances
  • Reviewing mergers and acquisitions
  • Imposing administrative monetary fines

The decision-making body of the Authority is the Competition Board.


3. Anti-Competitive Agreements and Concerted Practices

3.1. Prohibition under Article 4

Article 4 of Law No. 4054 prohibits agreements, concerted practices, and decisions of associations of undertakings that have as their object or effect the prevention, distortion, or restriction of competition.

Common examples include:

  • Price fixing
  • Market and customer sharing
  • Output restriction
  • Bid rigging

Such practices are considered per se violations, especially in cartel cases.


3.2. Exemptions

Certain agreements may benefit from individual or block exemptions if they:

  • Improve production or distribution
  • Promote technical or economic progress
  • Allow consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit
  • Do not eliminate competition in a substantial part of the market

Turkey has adopted several Communiqués on Block Exemptions, notably for vertical agreements.


4. Abuse of Dominant Position

4.1. Dominance under Article 6

Article 6 prohibits the abuse of a dominant position by one or more undertakings in a relevant market.

Dominance is defined as the power to act independently of competitors and consumers.

Examples of abusive conduct include:

  • Excessive or predatory pricing
  • Refusal to deal
  • Tying and bundling
  • Discriminatory practices

Unlike agreements, dominance itself is not prohibited; only its abuse is.


5. Merger Control

5.1. Notification and Review

Mergers and acquisitions are subject to mandatory notification if certain turnover thresholds are exceeded, as set out in the Communiqué No. 2010/4 on Mergers and Acquisitions Requiring the Approval of the Competition Board.

Transactions that result in the creation or strengthening of a dominant position, or significantly impede effective competition, may be prohibited or conditionally approved.


5.2. Gun-Jumping

Closing a transaction before obtaining clearance from the Competition Board constitutes gun-jumping and may result in administrative fines.


6. Enforcement and Sanctions

The Competition Board may impose:

  • Administrative fines of up to 10% of the annual gross revenue of the undertaking
  • Periodic penalty payments
  • Structural or behavioral remedies

Individuals such as executives and employees may also face personal fines in certain cases.


7. Leniency Program

Turkey operates an effective leniency program, particularly in cartel investigations.

Undertakings that:

  • Voluntarily disclose cartel activities
  • Provide significant evidence

may benefit from:

  • Full immunity from fines, or
  • Significant fine reductions

8. Judicial Review

Decisions of the Competition Board are subject to judicial review before the Administrative Courts, with final appeal before the Council of State (Danıştay).


9. International Alignment

Turkey’s competition law regime is harmonized with international standards, particularly EU competition law. The Turkish Competition Authority cooperates with international organizations and foreign competition authorities.


10. Conclusion

Competition law in Turkey provides a comprehensive and effective framework for maintaining fair competition and market efficiency. With a strong legal basis, an independent enforcement authority, and alignment with EU principles, Turkey continues to offer a predictable and transparent competition law environment for both domestic and foreign undertakings.


Categories: